Responses
Author meets critics: response
Are we unfit for the future?
Compose a Response to This Article
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 18 May 2017
- Published on: 18 May 2017Re: Are we unfit for the future?Show More
Beauchamp recently argues that Persson and Savulescu's project of moral enhancement will exacerbate existing distributive unfairness. That is, the programme aiming to increase persons' sympathy and other relevant emotional components of moral sense that are believed to help create a better future will actually lead to a worse situation. Beauchamp admonishes that the moral enhancement programme may like other enhancemen...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
Other content recommended for you
- Reply to commentators on Unfit for the Future
- Too good for this world: moral bioenhancement and the ethics of making moral misfits
- Moral enhancement, freedom, and what we (should) value in moral behaviour
- Moral bioenhancement is dangerous
- On not taking men as they are: reflections on moral bioenhancement
- Voluntary moral enhancement and the survival-at-any-cost bias
- Taking liberties with free fall
- A question about defining moral bioenhancement
- Frequently overlooked realistic moral bioenhancement interventions
- Freedom and moral enhancement