Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
In Unfit for the Future, Ingmar Persson and Julian Savulescu take up intriguing questions about whether human moral capacities should be improved to steer us in paths of improved decision making in confronting global crises. They assess the sufficiency of traditional moral practices and human nature as we confront ever more daunting moral and policy challenges. They start from the position that ‘human beings are not by nature equipped with a moral psychology that empowers them to cope with the moral problems that these new conditions of life create. Nor could the currently favoured political system of liberal democracy overcome these moral deficiencies’ (p. 1).1
The authors defend their starting point by presenting a variety of scenarios and conditions under which humans commonly fail to pursue a morally proper course of action even when aware that it is the proper course. Critical weaknesses include failed political will, biases to the near future, partiality to family and friends, insufficient sympathy, low levels of non-parochial altruism, underdeveloped conceptions of responsibility and a relatively weak sense of justice. The authors assess human nature as so morally deficient that it will be unable to successfully address impending and catastrophic problems at the global level: ‘Human beings now have at their disposal means by which they could undermine the conditions of worthwhile life on Earth forever’ through their failures to deal with the depletion of essential natural resources, overpopulation, poverty, terrorism, anthropogenic climate change, nuclear weapons and use of biological weapons (p. 1, 2, 5, 37–39, 47–49, 60–63, 66–68, 75, 76, 83, 108, 109, 123, 127, 133, 134).1
This book's most convincing and sobering arguments are in its many passages on the depth and continuously increasing character of these catastrophic problems. It is the most persuasive presentation of the threats these …
Footnotes
-
Competing interests None.
-
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Linked Articles
- Editorial
- Author meets critics: precis
- Author meets critics: response
- Author meets critics: response
- Author meets critics: response
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Reply to commentators on Unfit for the Future
- Moral enhancement, freedom, and what we (should) value in moral behaviour
- Taking liberties with free fall
- Voluntary moral enhancement and the survival - at - any - cost bias
- Frequently overlooked realistic moral bioenhancement interventions
- Moral bioenhancement is dangerous
- Moral bioenhancement, freedom and reasoning
- Climate change, cooperation and moral bioenhancement
- On not taking men as they are: reflections on moral bioenhancement
- A question about defining moral bioenhancement