Article info
PDFAuthor meets critics: precis
Summary of Unfit for the Future
- Correspondence to Professor Julian Savulescu, Faculty of Philosophy, The Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Suite 8, Littlegate House, Oxford OX1 1PT, UK; julian.savulescu{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Summary of Unfit for the Future
Publication history
- Received April 19, 2013
- Accepted April 22, 2013
- First published December 13, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Reply to commentators on Unfit for the Future
- Too good for this world: moral bioenhancement and the ethics of making moral misfits
- Are we unfit for the future?
- Moral enhancement, freedom, and what we (should) value in moral behaviour
- Being good enough to prevent the worst
- Voluntary moral enhancement and the survival-at-any-cost bias
- Technological moral enhancement or traditional moral progress? Why not both?
- On not taking men as they are: reflections on moral bioenhancement
- Moral bioenhancement is dangerous
- A question about defining moral bioenhancement