Article Text
Viewpoint
Refugees, humanitarian aid and the right to decline vaccinations
Abstract
Recent instances of governments and others refusing humanitarian assistance to refugees and IDPs (internally-displaced persons) unless they agreed to polio immunization for their children raise difficult ethical challenges. The authors argue that states have the right and a responsibility to require such vaccinations in instances where the serious vaccine-preventable disease(s) at issue threaten others, including local populations, humanitarian workers, and others in camps or support settings.
- Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Delivering infectious disease interventions to women and children in conflict settings: a systematic review
- Immunisation financing and programme performance in the Middle East and North Africa, 2010 to 2017
- A refugee camp in the centre of Europe: clinical characteristics of asylum seekers arriving in Brussels
- Assessing the impact of polio supplementary immunisation activities on routine immunisation and health systems: a systematic review
- Containing measles in conflict-driven humanitarian settings
- 30 years of polio campaigns in Ethiopia, India and Nigeria: the impacts of campaign design on vaccine hesitancy and health worker motivation
- Health needs of refugee children identified on arrival in reception countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Does armed conflict lead to lower prevalence of maternal health-seeking behaviours: theoretical and empirical research based on 55 683 women in armed conflict settings
- Delivering nutrition interventions to women and children in conflict settings: a systematic review
- Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and uptake in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review