Recent instances of governments and others refusing humanitarian assistance to refugees and IDPs (internally-displaced persons) unless they agreed to polio immunization for their children raise difficult ethical challenges. The authors argue that states have the right and a responsibility to require such vaccinations in instances where the serious vaccine-preventable disease(s) at issue threaten others, including local populations, humanitarian workers, and others in camps or support settings.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Delivering infectious disease interventions to women and children in conflict settings: a systematic review
- Immunisation financing and programme performance in the Middle East and North Africa, 2010 to 2017
- A refugee camp in the centre of Europe: clinical characteristics of asylum seekers arriving in Brussels
- Assessing the impact of polio supplementary immunisation activities on routine immunisation and health systems: a systematic review
- Containing measles in conflict-driven humanitarian settings
- 30 years of polio campaigns in Ethiopia, India and Nigeria: the impacts of campaign design on vaccine hesitancy and health worker motivation
- Health needs of refugee children identified on arrival in reception countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Delivering nutrition interventions to women and children in conflict settings: a systematic review
- Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and uptake in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review
- Impact evaluation of immunisation service integration to nutrition programmes and paediatric outpatient departments of primary healthcare centres in Rumbek East and Rumbek Centre counties of South Sudan