Article Text
Abstract
In this paper, the authors consider the idea of the public biobank governance framework with respect to the innovative paradigm of One Health. The One Health initiative has been defined as an integrative and interdisciplinary effort to improve the lives and well-being of human beings and non-human animals, as well as to preserve the environment. Here, we use this approach as a starting presumption with respect to institutional design. We examine the theoretical and legal framework underlying the concept of biobanking that, being public orientated, is for the public good. We suggest that this account of research practice does not ethically correlate with One Health principles. Instead, we argue that One Health requires a model of biobanking that is based on universal goods, that is, goods that serve human beings as well as non-human animals and the environment, and which we define in detail. Our purpose is to begin a discussion on how One Health principles might be implemented in health initiatives.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Being well together? Promoting health and well-being through more than human collaboration and companionship
- A planetary vision for one health
- In critique of anthropocentrism: a more-than-human ethical framework for antimicrobial resistance
- Animal research nexus: a new approach to the connections between science, health and animal welfare
- Cohort profile: design and methods in the eye and vision consortium of UK Biobank
- Forty-two years of responding to Ebola virus outbreaks in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review
- Human embryonic stem cell research debates: a Confucian argument
- Future of keeping pet reptiles and amphibians: towards integrating animal welfare, human health and environmental sustainability
- The economics of improving global infectious disease surveillance
- A Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability