Article Text

Download PDFPDF
The duty to do the best for one's patient
  1. Roger Crisp
  1. Correspondence to
    Professor Roger Crisp, St Anne's College, Oxford OX2 6HS, USA; roger.crisp{at}


This paper is a discussion of the duty of doctors to do what is best for their patients. What is required by this duty is shown to depend on the circumstances, including any financial constraints on the doctor. The duty to do the best is a duty of benevolence, and this virtue itself has to be understood as bounded by other virtues, including justice and professional responsibility. An Aristotelian account of medical benevolence is developed, and the issues of supererogation and individual judgement are discussed within this framework. The paper ends with the claim that the patient-centred conception of benevolence defended in the paper is in line with consequentialist and deontological ethical traditions.

  • beneficence
  • doctor-patient relationship
  • doing the best
  • virtue
  • Aristotle

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • The concise argument
    Michael J Selgelid