Article info
PDFThe concise argument
Conflicting clinical duties
Citation
Conflicting clinical duties
Publication history
- First published February 20, 2015.
Online issue publication
February 20, 2015
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Zero tolerance against patriarchal norms? A cross-sectional study of Swedish physicians’ attitudes towards young females requesting virginity certificates or hymen restoration
- Toward accommodating physicians’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure
- Conscientious objection in Italy
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: why tribunals might be the answer
- When should conscientious objection be accepted?
- A critical review of conscientious objection and decriminalisation of abortion in Chile
- Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies
- Against the accommodation of subjective healthcare provider beliefs in medicine: counteracting supporters of conscientious objector accommodation arguments
- Professional and conscience-based refusals: the case of the psychiatrist's harmful prescription
- Public reason and the limited right to conscientious objection: a response to Magelssen