Article info
PDFThe concise argument
Conflicting clinical duties
Citation
Conflicting clinical duties
Publication history
- First published February 20, 2015.
Online issue publication
February 20, 2015
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Toward accommodating physicians ’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure
- When should conscientious objection be accepted
- Public reason and the limited right to conscientious objection: a response to Magelssen
- The ethics of policy writing: how should hospitals deal with moral disagreement about controversial medical practices
- Professional duties of conscientious objectors
- Conscientious objection in healthcare and the duty to refer
- Junior doctors and conscientious objection to voluntary assisted dying: ethical complexity in practice
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Questionable benefits and unavoidable personal beliefs: defending conscientious objection for abortion
- Professional and conscience - based refusals: the case of the psychiatrist 's harmful prescription