Background In the ethical and clinical literature, cases of parents who want treatment for their child to be withdrawn against the views of the medical team have not received much attention. Yet resolution of such conflicts demands much effort of both the medical team and parents.
Objective To discuss who can best protect a child's interests, which often becomes a central issue, putting considerable pressure on mutual trust and partnership.
Methods We describe the case of a 3-year-old boy with acquired brain damage due to autoimmune-mediated encephalitis whose parents wanted to stop treatment. By comparing this case with relevant literature, we systematically explored the pros and cons of sharing end-of-life decisions with parents in cases where treatment is considered futile by parents and not (yet) by physicians.
Conclusions Sharing end-of-life decisions with parents is a more important duty for physicians than protecting parents from guilt or doubt. Moreover, a request from parents on behalf of their child to discontinue treatment is, and should be, hard to over-rule in cases with significant prognostic uncertainty and/or in cases with divergent opinions within the medical team.
- End of Life Care
- Minors/Parental Consent
- Right to Refuse Treatment
- Allowing Minors to Die
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- ‘Best interests’ in paediatric intensive care: an empirical ethics study
- Culpability and blame after pregnancy loss
- The best interests test at the end of life on PICU: a plea for a family centred approach
- Should religious beliefs be allowed to stonewall a secular approach to withdrawing and withholding treatment in children?
- Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice
- Should children’s autonomy be respected by telling them of their imminent death?
- Medical ethics for children: applying the four principles to paediatrics
- Parental discretion
- Parental experiences of end of life care decision-making for children with life-limiting conditions in the paediatric intensive care unit: a qualitative interview study
- A threshold of significant harm (f)or a viable alternative therapeutic option?