Wardrope argues against my proposed non-consequentialist policy for the distribution of scarce influenza vaccine in the face of a pandemic. According to him, even if one accepts what he calls my deontological ethical theory, it does not follow that we are required to agree with my proposed randomised allocation of doses of vaccine by means of a lottery. He argues in particular that I fail to consider fully the prophylactic role of vaccination whereby it serves to protect from infection more people than are vaccinated. He concludes that: ‘The benefits and burdens of vaccination are provided impartially and far more effectively by targeted vaccination than impartial lotteries.’
He has shown convincingly that this conclusion can be established in the case of his particular envisaged scenario. However, Wardrope gives no reason to suppose that, in the circumstances that we actually face, targeted vaccination would constitute impartial treatment of citizens in the UK.
I readily agree with Wardrope that if it should treat its citizens justly and impartially, it does not necessarily follow that the state should distribute vaccinations of the basis of a lottery. That will be a reasonable thing to do only if certain assumptions are made. These assumptions will not always be reasonable. However, they are reasonable ones to make in the actual circumstances that currently apply.
- Allocation of Health Care Resources
- Right to Healthcare
- Philosophical Ethics
- Distributive Justice
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Scarce vaccine supplies in an influenza pandemic should not be distributed randomly: reply to McLachlan
- Love thy neighbour? Allocating vaccines in a world of competing obligations
- Vaccine ethics: an ethical framework for global distribution of COVID-19 vaccines
- Global access to COVID-19 vaccines: a scoping review of factors that may influence equitable access for low and middle-income countries
- A proposed non-consequentialist policy for the ethical distribution of scarce vaccination in the face of an influenza pandemic
- Effectiveness of vaccine against pandemic influenza A/H1N1 among people with underlying chronic diseases: cohort study, Denmark, 2009-10
- Towards A new model of global health justice: the case of COVID-19 vaccines
- Vaccine equity in COVID-19: a meta-narrative review
- Ethical allocation of future COVID-19 vaccines
- Effectiveness of AS03 adjuvanted pandemic H1N1 vaccine: case-control evaluation based on sentinel surveillance system in Canada, autumn 2009