Article Text
Abstract
The aim of this article is to draw attention to an under-recognised but ethically important phenomenon involving the deception of children in research. The type of deception we are referring to is not planned deception that is part of the research design. Instead it is deception that occurs in individual cases where parents ask researchers not to reveal something about the research to their child. Our focus is children who do not have ultimate decisional authority—children around the ages of 7–14 years old who may have the cognitive capacity to understand but not to consent for themselves; children whose agreement is required but not sufficient to authorise research. We provide three illustrative scenarios for analysis. Then, we identify circumstances in which non-disclosure might be justified and set out reasons why providing information to non-competent children is ethically required. On this basis, we argue that non-planned deception requested by parents is very unlikely to be ethically acceptable. Finally, we recommend that guidelines should (a) require researchers to consider what to do if parents do not want to disclose information to a child and (b) clarify that the most ethical response is to simply not include that child in the research.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Children in health research: a matter of trust
- Why collaborate with children in health research: an analysis of the risks and benefits of collaboration with children
- Why do parents enrol their children in research: a narrative synthesis
- Assent for children's participation in research is incoherent and wrong
- Hearing the voices of children: self-reported information on children's experiences during research procedures: a study protocol
- When to start paediatric testing of the adult HIV cure research agenda?
- Children’s consent and paediatric research: is it appropriate for healthy children to be the decision-makers in clinical research?
- The science of paediatrics, child health research, and the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
- Are positive experiences of children in non-therapeutic research justifiable research benefits?
- The child's perspective on discomfort during medical research procedures: a descriptive study