Article Text
Abstract
The law regulating abortion in Italy gives healthcare practitioners the option to make a conscientious objection to activities that are specific and necessary to an abortive intervention. Conscientious objectors among Italian gynaecologists amount to about 70%. This means that only a few doctors are available to perform abortions, and therefore access to abortion is subject to constraints. In 2012 the International Planned Parenthood Federation European Network (IPPF EN) lodged a complaint against Italy to the European Committee of Social Rights, claiming that the inadequate protection of the right to access abortion implies a violation of the right to health. In this paper I will discuss the Italian situation with respect to conscientious objection to abortion and I will suggest possible solutions to the problem.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- Public health ethics
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Data discrepancies: Italian ministry reports on abortion, contextualised
- Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies
- The BMA's guidance on conscientious objection may be contrary to human rights law
- Conscientious objection and medical tribunals
- Intended and unintended consequences of abortion law reform: perspectives of abortion experts in Victoria, Australia
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Conscientious objection in healthcare, referral and the military analogy
- Questionable benefits and unavoidable personal beliefs: defending conscientious objection for abortion
- Conscientious objection should not be equated with moral objection: a response to Ben-Moshe
- A critical review of conscientious objection and decriminalisation of abortion in Chile