Article info
PDFPublic health ethics
Paper
Conscientious objection in Italy
- Correspondence to Dr Francesca Minerva, University of Melbourne, Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria 3050, Australia; francesca.minerva{at}unimelb.edu.au
Citation
Conscientious objection in Italy
Publication history
- Received June 13, 2013
- Revised August 26, 2013
- Accepted November 14, 2013
- First published May 26, 2014.
Online issue publication
January 31, 2017
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies
- The BMA's guidance on conscientious objection may be contrary to human rights law
- Conscientious objection and medical tribunals
- Intended and unintended consequences of abortion law reform: perspectives of abortion experts in Victoria, Australia
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Conscientious objection in healthcare, referral and the military analogy
- Questionable benefits and unavoidable personal beliefs: defending conscientious objection for abortion
- Conscientious objection should not be equated with moral objection: a response to Ben-Moshe
- A critical review of conscientious objection and decriminalisation of abortion in Chile
- Is it ethical for a general practitioner to claim a conscientious objection when asked to refer for abortion?