Article Text
Abstract
Objective To assess the issue of ‘retrospective consent’ among a cohort of patients who had survived with unfavourable outcome and to assess attitudes among next of kin regarding their role as surrogate decision makers.
Methods Twenty patients who had survived for at least 3 years with an unfavourable outcome following a decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury were assessed with their next of kin. During the course of a semistructured interview, participants were asked whether they would have provided consent if they had known their eventual outcome. They were also asked for general comments regarding all aspects of the clinical journey. Eighteen patients had next of kin who were available for interview. For two patients, there was no longer any family involvement.
Results Of the 20 patients, 13 were able to provide a response and 11 felt that they would have provided consent even if they had known their eventual outcome. Of the 18 next of kin who were able to express an opinion, 10 felt that they would have provided retrospective consent.
Conclusions Many patients appeared to have adapted to a level of disability that competent individuals might deem unacceptable. This does not necessarily mean that such outcomes should be regarded as ‘favourable’, nor that decompressive craniectomy must be performed for patients with predicted poor outcome. Nevertheless, those burdened with the initial clinical decisions and thereafter the long-term care of these patients may draw some support from the knowledge that unfavourable may not necessarily be unacceptable.
- Clinical Ethics
- Informed Consent
- Neuroethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Linked Articles
- Clinical ethics
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Ethical considerations for performing decompressive craniectomy as a life - saving intervention for severe traumatic brain injury
- Neurotrauma and the rule of rescue
- Comparative effectiveness of surgery in traumatic acute subdural and intracerebral haematoma: study protocol for a prospective observational study within CENTER - TBI and Net - QuRe
- Subacute complications during recovery from severe traumatic brain injury: frequency and associations with outcome
- IMPACT and CRASH prognostic models for traumatic brain injury: external validation in a South - American cohort
- Traumatic subdural haematoma: integrating case - based clinical judgement with guidelines
- Prehospital management of severe traumatic brain injury
- Treatment interventions for severe traumatic brain injury: limited evidence, choice limitations
- Intracranial pressure monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury
- Prognostication in critically ill patients with severe traumatic brain injury: the TBI - Prognosis multicentre feasibility study