Article Text
Abstract
Speaking of the public response to the deaths of children at the Bristol Royal Infirmary before 2001, the BMJ commented that the NHS would be ‘all changed, changed utterly’. Today, two inquiries into the Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust suggest nothing changed at all. Many patients died as a result of their care and the stories of indifference and neglect there are harrowing. Yet Bristol and Mid Staffordshire are not isolated reports. In 2011, the Health Services Ombudsman reported on the care of elderly and frail patients in the NHS and found a failure to recognise their humanity and individuality and to respond to them with sensitivity, compassion and professionalism. Likewise, the Care Quality Commission and Healthcare Commission received complaints from patients and relatives about the quality of nursing care. These included patients not being fed, patients left in soiled bedding, poor hygiene practices, and general disregard for privacy and dignity. Why is there such tolerance of poor clinical standards? We need a better understanding of the circumstances that can lead to these outcomes and how best to respond to them. We discuss the findings of these and other reports and consider whether attention should be devoted to managing individual behaviour, or focus on the systemic influences which predispose hospital staff to behave in this way. Lastly, we consider whether we should look further afield to cognitive psychology to better understand how clinicians and managers make decisions?
- Clinical Ethics
- Malpractice
- Regulation
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Commissioning through competition and cooperation in the English NHS under the Health and Social Care Act 2012: evidence from a qualitative study of four clinical commissioning groups
- ‘Speaking Up’ for patient safety and staff well-being: a qualitative study
- Identifying factors that promote and limit the effective use of real-time patient experience feedback: a mixed-methods study in secondary care
- Root causes of organisational failure: look up, not down
- Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures in Peru: a cross-sectional study of satisfaction and net promoter score using the 2016 EnSuSalud survey
- Patient safety regulation in the NHS: mapping the regulatory landscape of healthcare
- Comparing safety climate for nurses working in operating theatres, critical care and ward areas in the UK: a mixed methods study
- Improving compliance with the duty of candour: 5-year experience within an endoscopy department
- A qualitative study of diverse providers' behaviour in response to commissioners, patients and innovators in England: research protocol
- Identifying positively deviant elderly medical wards using routinely collected NHS Safety Thermometer data: an observational study