Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
When the Francis Inquiry report1 was published in February 2013, one of the main criticisms made was that there were too many recommendations and a lack of clarity about what needed to be done. When, as someone who had been an assessor to the Inquiry I put the question back to people ‘so what would you suggest needs to be done?’, I nearly always got the reply ‘ah, that's very difficult...’
With hindsight, it is all too easy to forget that the initial response from the National Health Service (NHS) policy and management community was often one of ambivalence. The report's diagnosis, (which most people seemed to agree with) was apparently harder to bear if there was no clear scapegoat at whom the finger of blame could be pointed. They acknowledged that doctors, nurses and other staff failed to uphold basic professional duties; the leadership team at Stafford was distracted by centrally imposed targets and the need to achieve financial balance and foundation trust status; and the regulatory and supervisory system was seemingly incapable of reacting to many warning signs. The apparently amorphous ‘culture’ was to blame, but where did this leave the clinician, ward manager, hospital board, clinical commissioner or Department of Health official trying to work out what to do …
Footnotes
Competing interests JAS was an expert adviser and witness to the Francis Inquiry, and an assessor of policy recommendations made by the Inquiry.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Linked Articles
- Commentary
- Clinical ethics
- Commentary
- Commentary
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Culture, compassion and clinical neglect: probity in the NHS after Mid Staffordshire
- Commissioning through competition and cooperation in the English NHS under the Health and Social Care Act 2012: evidence from a qualitative study of four clinical commissioning groups
- Resilience training: no more is needed or desired
- Understanding and evaluating new models of Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services in South - East England: a study protocol for an observational mixed - methods study
- What constitutes successful commissioning of transition from children ’s to adults ’ services for young people with long - term conditions and what are the challenges? An interview study
- Realist Evaluation of the Use of Patient Experience Data to Improve the Quality of Inpatient Mental Health Care (EURIPIDES) in England: study protocol
- Views of NHS commissioners on commissioning support provision. Evidence from a qualitative study examining the early development of clinical commissioning groups in England
- Summary of latest NHS England Emergency Preparedness Resilience and Response (EPRR) guidance
- The clinician impact and financial cost to the NHS of litigation over pregabalin: a cohort study in English primary care
- Developing patient - centred, feasible alternative care for adult emergency department users with epilepsy: protocol for the mixed - methods observational ‘ Collaborate ’ project