Article Text
PDFAuthor meets critics: response
Dignity's steer, dignity's subjects, dignity's synonyms? Three questions for dignity's supporter(s)
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests The author was the external examiner for Charles Foster's PhD, in which some of the questions posed in this paper were explored.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Linked Articles
- Author meets critics: response
- Author meets critics: response
- Author meets critics: response
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Whose dignity? Resolving ambiguities in the scope of “human dignity” in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
- Human dignity: a response to Camosy and Huxtable
- Dignity is a useless concept
- Ethical rhetoric: genomics and the moral content of UNESCO’s “universal” declarations
- What constitutional protection for freedom of scientific research?
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- Thalamic proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in vegetative state induced by traumatic brain injury
- Making sense of dignity
- Current controversies and irresolvable disagreement: the case of Vincent Lambert and the role of ‘dissensus’
- Causes and consequences of delays in treatment-withdrawal from PVS patients: a case study of Cumbria NHS Clinical Commissioning Group v Miss S and Ors [2016] EWCOP 32