Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Dignity tends to be unpopular among philosophers. At least when they are doing the day job.
It is not hard to see why. It is hard not to distrust a principle used to defend and denounce abortion, and to bay for the blood and pray for the life of a murderer. Its ubiquity in international and domestic declarations and codes does not help either. It is often used there as a placeholder, and the suspicion is that that is because it has no real substance. What substance it has, it is often thought, is creepily Judaeo-Christian: borrowed from the Imago Dei, and dressed up dishonestly as Cicero or Kant to deceive the unlettered. So, whether it is hopelessly amorphous, incurably theological or just plain incoherent, it has no place in the lexicon of a serious thinker.
But sometimes nothing but dignity will do.
It is wrong to use the head of a dead person as a football, for medical students to practise vaginal examinations on a woman in permanent vegetative state or to let youths at a Casualty Department gaze lustfully at the undraped body of a seriously brain-damaged girl—even though she enjoys their attention. The wrongness can only properly be described in the language of dignity, or in some language that is necessarily dependent on dignity. Respect …
Footnotes
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Linked Articles
- Author meets critics: response
- Author meets critics: response
- Author meets critics: response
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Causes and consequences of delays in treatment - withdrawal from PVS patients: a case study of Cumbria NHS Clinical Commissioning Group v Miss S and Ors [2016] EWCOP 32
- Court applications for withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration from patients in a permanent vegetative state: family experiences
- Ethical issues in diagnosis and management of patients in the permanent vegetative state
- How should doctors approach patients? A Confucian reflection on personhood
- Dignity and the use of body parts
- Proceeding with clinical trials of animal to human organ transplantation: a way out of the dilemma
- Withdrawing life - sustaining treatment: a stock - take of the legal and ethical position
- It is never lawful or ethical to withdraw life - sustaining treatment from patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness
- Functional neuroimaging and withdrawal of life - sustaining treatment from vegetative patients
- Means, ends and the ethics of fear - based public health campaigns