Article info
PDFAuthor meets critics: response
A response to Saviour Siblings: A Relational Approach to the Welfare of the Child in Selective Reproduction
- Correspondence to Professor Emily Jackson, Department of Law, LSE, London WC2A 2AE, UK; e.jackson{at}lse.ac.uk
Citation
A response to Saviour Siblings: A Relational Approach to the Welfare of the Child in Selective Reproduction
Publication history
- Received February 11, 2015
- Accepted February 27, 2015
- First published March 20, 2015.
Online issue publication
November 24, 2015
Article Versions
- Previous version (20 March 2015).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Britain’s new preimplantation tissue typing policy: an ethical defence
- Saviour Siblings: reply to critics
- Preimplantation HLA typing: having children to save our loved ones
- Should selecting saviour siblings be banned?
- Children who benefit families
- A relational approach to saviour siblings?
- Cohort profile: a national, population-based cohort of children born after assisted conception in the UK (1992–2009): methodology and birthweight analysis
- Is conceiving a child to benefit another against the interests of the new child?
- Ethics of using preimplantation genetic diagnosis to select a stem cell donor for an existing person
- Lowering the age limit of access to the identity of the gamete donor by donor offspring: the argument against