Article Text
Abstract
This paper proposes an ethical framework for evaluating biosafety risks of gain-of-function (GOF) experiments that create novel strains of influenza expected to be virulent and transmissible in humans, so-called potential pandemic pathogens (PPPs). Such research raises ethical concerns because of the risk that accidental release from a laboratory could lead to extensive or even global spread of a virulent pathogen. Biomedical research ethics has focused largely on human subjects research, while biosafety concerns about accidental infections, seen largely as a problem of occupational health, have been ignored. GOF/PPP research is an example of a small but important class of research where biosafety risks threaten public health, well beyond the small number of persons conducting the research.
We argue that bioethical principles that ordinarily apply only to human subjects research should also apply to research that threatens public health, even if, as in GOF/PPP studies, the research involves no human subjects. Specifically we highlight the Nuremberg Code's requirements of ‘fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods’, and proportionality of risk and humanitarian benefit, as broad ethical principles that recur in later documents on research ethics and should also apply to certain types of research not involving human subjects. We address several potential objections to this view, and conclude with recommendations for bringing these ethical considerations into policy development.
- Research Ethics
- History of Health Ethics/Bioethics
- Philosophical Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Synthetic biology and the ethics of knowledge
- Biodefence and the production of knowledge: rethinking the problem
- Public awareness, acceptability and risk perception about infectious diseases dual - use research of concern: a cross-sectional survey
- Health service research: the square peg in human subjects protection regulations
- Limits to research risks
- Whose ethics of knowledge? Taking the next step in evaluating knowledge in synthetic biology: a response to Douglas and Savulescu
- Emergency care research ethics in low - income and middle - income countries
- US government report recommends a “ principle of regulatory parsimony ” for synthetic biology
- Developing an ethics framework for living donor transplantation
- Quantifying the effects of promoting smokeless tobacco as a harm reduction strategy in the USA