This paper proposes an ethical framework for evaluating biosafety risks of gain-of-function (GOF) experiments that create novel strains of influenza expected to be virulent and transmissible in humans, so-called potential pandemic pathogens (PPPs). Such research raises ethical concerns because of the risk that accidental release from a laboratory could lead to extensive or even global spread of a virulent pathogen. Biomedical research ethics has focused largely on human subjects research, while biosafety concerns about accidental infections, seen largely as a problem of occupational health, have been ignored. GOF/PPP research is an example of a small but important class of research where biosafety risks threaten public health, well beyond the small number of persons conducting the research.
We argue that bioethical principles that ordinarily apply only to human subjects research should also apply to research that threatens public health, even if, as in GOF/PPP studies, the research involves no human subjects. Specifically we highlight the Nuremberg Code's requirements of ‘fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods’, and proportionality of risk and humanitarian benefit, as broad ethical principles that recur in later documents on research ethics and should also apply to certain types of research not involving human subjects. We address several potential objections to this view, and conclude with recommendations for bringing these ethical considerations into policy development.
- Research Ethics
- History of Health Ethics/Bioethics
- Philosophical Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Limits to research risks
- Implications of the concept of minimal risk in research on informed choice in clinical practice
- Lest we forget… research ethics in children: perhaps onerous, yet absolutely necessary
- Laboratory animals and the art of empathy
- A qualitative study of institutional review board members’ experience reviewing research proposals using emergency exception from informed consent
- Research abuses against people of colour and other vulnerable groups in early psychedelic research
- How not to argue against mandatory ethics review
- Health service research: the square peg in human subjects protection regulations
- Creating a ‘FatherConfessor’: the origins of research ethics committees in UK military medical research, 1950–1970. Part I, context and causes
- They were cheap and available: prisoners as research subjects in twentieth century America