Article info
PDFReproductive ethics
Commentary
Response to: ‘Questioning the significance of the non-identity problem in applied ethics’ by Lawlor
- Correspondence to Tony Hope, Emeritus Professor, The Ethox Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LG, UK; tonyhope{at}doctors.org.uk
Citation
Response to: ‘Questioning the significance of the non-identity problem in applied ethics’ by Lawlor
Publication history
- Received March 18, 2015
- Accepted April 13, 2015
- First published May 14, 2015.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Questioning the significance of the non-identity problem in applied ethics
- Questioning the significance of the non-identity problem in applied ethics: a reply to Tony Hope
- The production of medicoethical misconduct: medical ethics and vivisection in Wilkie Collins’s Heart and Science
- Can one do good medical ethics without principles?
- Acting parentally: an argument against sex selection
- Is there a moral obligation to select healthy children?
- What is it to do good medical ethics? A kaleidoscope of views
- Possible people, complaints, and the distinction between genetic planning and genetic engineering
- Sparrows, hedgehogs and castrati: reflections on gender and enhancement
- Reflections on learning and teaching medical ethics in UK medical schools