Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
I thank the editors of the Journal of Medical Ethics for allowing me to respond to the criticisms levelled against me by Rob Lawlor in his paper ‘Questioning the significance of the non-identity problem in applied ethics’.1
Lawlor's central argument, as I understand it, is about the interesting issue, not often discussed, as to what are our responsibilities as writers in applied ethics. Lawlor makes this point in the context of the non-identity effect, but his central argument seems to me to be more general. This central argument is that in the setting of significant disagreement among philosophers with respect to an issue that is substantially philosophical in nature, those making use of the issue in an argument in practical (or applied) ethics have a duty to explain the various philosophical disagreements. This duty is particularly strong when writing for a multidisciplinary audience.
In discussing the non-identity issue, Lawlor makes distinctions, which I like, between the non-identity effect, argument and problem.
With regard to his specific complaints against me, Lawlor cites two of my publications claiming that:
I do not make clear that the non-identity argument is controversial.
I do not make clear that my conclusions from the fact of the non-identity effect are not the same as those of Parfit.
I do not defend my position against that taken by Parfit.
I believe that the non-identity effect does make a moral difference in some situations.
That my language is overconfident, at least when I wrote: “In this case, it seems to me, normal intuition is wrong: it is based on a false metaphysics”.
There are two further papers that I have co-authored dealing with the non-identity issue that Lawlor …
Footnotes
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Questioning the significance of the non-identity problem in applied ethics: a reply to Tony Hope
- Questioning the significance of the non-identity problem in applied ethics
- Acting parentally: an argument against sex selection
- A defence of a new perspective on euthanasia
- Is there a moral obligation to select healthy children
- Assisted suicide and the killing of people? Maybe. Physician - assisted suicide and the killing of patients? No: the rejection of Shaw 's new perspective on euthanasia
- Why sex selection should be legal
- Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and rational choice under risk or uncertainty
- Correction: Questioning the significance of the non-identity problem in applied ethics: a reply to Tony Hope
- Moral duties and euthanasia: why to kill is not necessarily the same as to let die