Authors such as Tony Hope and Julian Savulescu appeal to Derek Parfit's non-identity problem in relation to particular questions in applied ethics, and particularly in reproductive ethics. They argue that the non-identity problem shows that an individual cannot be harmed by being brought into existence, and therefore, we cannot say that the individual is harmed if, for example, we select an embryo in order to have a deaf child. Thus, they argue that an appeal to the non-identity problem blocks (or significantly reduces the force of) objections in a number of cases. I argue that these discussions often give the impression that this is a clear conclusion, shared by most philosophers, and largely beyond dispute. This is particularly significant because these discussions are often in journals or books with an interdisciplinary readership. My concern is that they give the impression of stating: ‘philosophers have studied this issue, and this is the conclusion they have reached. Now I will emphasise the implications for medical ethics’. I argue that, far from being the consensus view, the view presented by Hope and Savulescu is rejected by many, including Parfit himself.
- Reproductive Medicine
- Future child disability
- Genetic Selection
- Philosophical Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Multiplex parenting: IVG and the generations to come
- Is there a moral obligation to select healthy children?
- Summary of Bioethical Prescriptions
- Acting parentally: an argument against sex selection
- Do we need an alternative ‘relational approach’ to saviour siblings?
- Genetic modification of characteristic masculine traits: enhancement or deformity?
- Moral reasons to edit the human genome: picking up from the Nuffield report
- Arguments on thin ice: on non-medical egg freezing and individualisation arguments
- Saviour Siblings: reply to critics
- Why sex selection should be legal