Article Text
Current controversy
Treatment-resistant depression and physician-assisted death
Abstract
In a recent article, Udo Schuklenk and Suzanne van de Vathorst argued in favour of a legal option of physician-assisted death for patients with ‘treatment-resistant’ depression. In this commentary, I contend that their argument neglects the important consideration of the professional integrity of physicians. In light of this consideration, coupled with uncertainty about whether additional interventions with the patient can improve quality of life and restore the will to live, it is not appropriate to include patients with ‘treatment-resistant’ depression within a legal option of physician-assisted death.
- Clinical Ethics
- Death
- Euthanasia
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Drawing the line on physician-assisted death
- Physician-assisted death does not violate professional integrity
- Competence for physician-assisted death of patients with mental disorders: theoretical and practical considerations
- When slippery slope arguments miss the mark: a lesson from one against physician-assisted death
- Organ donation after medical assistance in dying or cessation of life-sustaining treatment requested by conscious patients: the Canadian context
- Treatment-resistant major depressive disorder and assisted dying
- Mrs Pretty and Ms B
- Making a case for the inclusion of refractory and severe mental illness as a sole criterion for Canadians requesting medical assistance in dying (MAiD): a review
- Death - whose decision? Euthanasia and the terminally ill
- Canadian French and English newspapers’ portrayals of physicians’ role and medical assistance in dying (MAiD) from 1972 to 2016: a qualitative textual analysis