Article info
PDFCommentary
Religion's place at the table of ‘secular’ medical ethics: a response to the commentaries
- Correspondence to Professor Nigel Biggar, Christ Church, Oxford OX1 1DP, UK; nigel.biggar{at}chch.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Religion's place at the table of ‘secular’ medical ethics: a response to the commentaries
Publication history
- Received July 28, 2015
- Accepted August 12, 2015
- First published September 24, 2015.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Religion, secular medicine and utilitarianism: a response to Biggar
- On the univocity of rationality: a response to Nigel Biggar’s ‘Why religion deserves a place in secular medicine’
- Why religion deserves a place in secular medicine
- Doing good medical ethics: a Christian perspective
- Does religion deserve a place in secular medicine?
- Religion, reason, controversies and perspectives in clinical and research ethics
- Further clarity on cooperation and morality
- Women in pain: how narratives of pain and sacrifice complicate the debate over the Catholic provision of obstetrical care
- Should religious beliefs be allowed to stonewall a secular approach to withdrawing and withholding treatment in children?
- Does bioethics exist?