On the univocity of rationality: a response to Nigel Biggar’s ‘Why religion deserves a place in secular medicine’
Share this article
Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.
Email this article to a friend
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Religion's place at the table of ‘secular’ medical ethics: a response to the commentaries
- Doing good medical ethics: a Christian perspective
- Religion, reason, controversies and perspectives in clinical and research ethics
- Why religion deserves a place in secular medicine
- Religion, secular medicine and utilitarianism: a response to Biggar
- Women in pain: how narratives of pain and sacrifice complicate the debate over the Catholic provision of obstetrical care
- You shall bury him: burial, suicide and the development of Catholic law and theology
- Does religion deserve a place in secular medicine?
- Teaching spirituality to humanitarians
- On not taking men as they are: reflections on moral bioenhancement