Article info
PDFCommentary
On the univocity of rationality: a response to Nigel Biggar’s ‘Why religion deserves a place in secular medicine’
- Correspondence to Xavier Symons, University of Sydney—Philosophy, School of Philosophy and Historical Enquiry, A14 Quadrangle Building, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; xsym5276{at}uni.sydney.edu.au
Citation
On the univocity of rationality: a response to Nigel Biggar’s ‘Why religion deserves a place in secular medicine’
Publication history
- Received March 23, 2015
- Revised June 4, 2015
- Accepted June 15, 2015
- First published July 2, 2015.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Religion's place at the table of ‘secular’ medical ethics: a response to the commentaries
- Doing good medical ethics: a Christian perspective
- Religion, reason, controversies and perspectives in clinical and research ethics
- Why religion deserves a place in secular medicine
- Religion, secular medicine and utilitarianism: a response to Biggar
- Women in pain: how narratives of pain and sacrifice complicate the debate over the Catholic provision of obstetrical care
- You shall bury him: burial, suicide and the development of Catholic law and theology
- Does religion deserve a place in secular medicine?
- Teaching spirituality to humanitarians
- On not taking men as they are: reflections on moral bioenhancement