Article info
PDFCommentary
Religion, secular medicine and utilitarianism: a response to Biggar
- Correspondence to Dr Kevin R Smith, SET, Abertay University, Bell Street, Dundee DD1 1HG, UK; k.smith{at}abertay.ac.uk
Citation
Religion, secular medicine and utilitarianism: a response to Biggar
Publication history
- Received March 13, 2015
- Revised April 15, 2015
- Accepted May 31, 2015
- First published June 19, 2015.
Online issue publication
October 22, 2015
Article Versions
- Previous version (19 June 2015).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Religion 's place at the table of ‘ secular ’ medical ethics: a response to the commentaries
- Should religious beliefs be allowed to stonewall a secular approach to withdrawing and withholding treatment in children
- Some principles of Islamic ethics as found in Harrisian philosophy
- What makes killing wrong
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Further clarity on cooperation and morality
- The common premise for uncommon conclusions
- On the univocity of rationality: a response to Nigel Biggar ’s ‘ Why religion deserves a place in secular medicine ’
- Islam and the four principles of medical ethics
- Moral theories in teaching applied ethics