Article info
PDFThe concise argument
Religion, reason, controversies and perspectives in clinical and research ethics
Citation
Religion, reason, controversies and perspectives in clinical and research ethics
Publication history
- First published October 22, 2015.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- On the univocity of rationality: a response to Nigel Biggar’s ‘Why religion deserves a place in secular medicine’
- Drawing the line on physician-assisted death
- Treatment-resistant depression and physician-assisted death
- Death - whose decision? Euthanasia and the terminally ill
- Religion's place at the table of ‘secular’ medical ethics: a response to the commentaries
- Directed altruistic living donation: what is wrong with the beauty contest?
- Responding to complexity
- Safeguarding choice at the end of life
- Against the accommodation of subjective healthcare provider beliefs in medicine: counteracting supporters of conscientious objector accommodation arguments
- Religion, secular medicine and utilitarianism: a response to Biggar