Article metrics
Research ethics
Paper
‘Ethical responsibility’ or ‘a whole can of worms’: differences in opinion on incidental finding review and disclosure in neuroimaging research from focus group discussions with participants, parents, IRB members, investigators, physicians and community members
Online download statistics by month:
Other content recommended for you
- The evaluation of the risks and benefits of phase II cancer clinical trials by institutional review board (IRB) members: a case study
- When are clinical trials beneficial for study patients and future patients? A factorial vignette-based survey of institutional review board members
- Variations in institutional review board processes and consent requirements for trauma research: an EAST multicenter survey
- A qualitative study of institutional review board members’ experience reviewing research proposals using emergency exception from informed consent
- Ethics committees for biomedical research in some African emerging countries: which establishment for which independence? A comparison with the USA and Canada
- Clinical research with economically disadvantaged populations
- Developing capacity to protect human research subjects in a post-conflict, resource-constrained setting: procedures and prospects
- How IRBs view and make decisions about coercion and undue influence
- Practices and challenges of community engagement in health research in Ethiopia: a qualitative study
- How US institutional review boards decide when researchers need to translate studies