Article Text
Abstract
The main aim of this paper is to examine the fairness of different ways of holding people responsible for healthcare-related choices. Our focus is on conceptualisations of responsibility that involve blame and sanctions, and our analytical approach is to provide a systematic discussion based on interrelated and successive health-related, lifestyle choices of an individual. We assess the already established risk-sharing, backward-looking and forward-looking views on responsibility according to a variety of standard objections. In conclusion, all of the proposed views on holding people responsible for their lifestyle choices are subjected to reasonable critiques, although the risk-sharing view fare considerably better than the others overall considered. With our analytical approach, we are able to identify how basic conditions for responsibility ascription alter along a time axis. Repeated relapses with respect to healthcare associated with persistent, unhealthy lifestyle choices, call for distinct attention. In such situations, contextualised reasoning and transparent policy-making, rather than opaque clinical judgements, are required as steps towards fair allocation of healthcare resources.
- Distributive Justice
- Ethics
- Political Philosophy
- Public Policy
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Feiring 's concept of forward - looking responsibility: a dead end for responsibility in healthcare
- Commitment contracts as a way to health
- Lifestyle, responsibility and justice
- Just health responsibility
- Betting on health
- Responsibility in healthcare across time and agents
- Personal responsibility within health policy: unethical and ineffective
- Prevention in the age of personal responsibility: epigenetic risk - predictive screening for female cancers as a case study
- Personal responsibility for health as a rationing criterion: why we do n’t like it and why maybe we should
- A framework for luck egalitarianism in health and healthcare