Article Text
Abstract
A chief objection to opt-out organ donor registration policies is that they do not secure people's actual consent to donation, and so fail to respect their autonomy rights to decide what happens to their organs after they die. However, scholars have recently offered two powerful responses to this objection. First, Michael B Gill argues that opt-out policies do not fail to respect people's autonomy simply because they do not secure people's actual consent to donation. Second, Ben Saunders argues that opt-out policies do secure people's actual—if not explicit—consent, provided that certain conditions are satisfied. I argue that Gill and Saunders’ arguments are not successful. My conclusion does not imply that jurisdictions should not implement opt-out policies—their failure to secure people's actual consent may be outweighed by other considerations. But, my conclusion does imply that Gill and Saunders are mistaken to claim that opt-out policies are respectful of people's autonomy.
- Autonomy
- Donation/Procurement of Organs/Tissues
- Public Policy
- Rights
- Informed Consent
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Linked Articles
- Research ethics
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Understanding (and) consent: a response to MacKay
- Opt - out organ donation without presumptions
- Normative consent and opt - out organ donation
- Ethics of organ procurement from the unrepresented patient population
- Can informed consent to research be adapted to risk
- The UK Human Tissue Act and consent: surrendering a fundamental principle to transplantation needs
- Ethics needs principles — four can encompass the rest — and respect for autonomy should be “ first among equals ”
- Taylor on presumed consent
- Deciding on behalf of others: a population survey on procedural preferences for surrogate decision - making
- Is best interests a relevant decision making standard for enrolling non-capacitated subjects into clinical research