Article info
PDFNeuroethics
Paper
Putting a price on empathy: against incentivising moral enhancement
- Correspondence to Sarah Carter, University of Manchester, School of Law, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; sarah.carter-4{at}postgrad.manchester.ac.uk
Citation
Putting a price on empathy: against incentivising moral enhancement
Publication history
- Received March 24, 2015
- Revised June 23, 2015
- Accepted July 22, 2015
- First published August 11, 2015.
Online issue publication
December 19, 2017
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Reply to commentators on Unfit for the Future
- Technological moral enhancement or traditional moral progress? Why not both?
- ‘My child will never initiate Ultimate Harm’: an argument against moral enhancement
- Amoral enhancement
- Voluntary moral enhancement and the survival-at-any-cost bias
- Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?
- Too good for this world: moral bioenhancement and the ethics of making moral misfits
- The perils of failing to enhance: a response to Persson and Savulescu
- Why we can't really say what post-persons are
- Freedom and moral enhancement