Article info
JME40: Good medical ethics
Paper
Good medical ethics
- Correspondence to Dr Dan Brock, Division of Medical Ethics, Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 2115, USA; dan_brock{at}hms.harvard.edu
Citation
Good medical ethics
Publication history
- Received August 15, 2014
- Accepted August 21, 2014
- First published December 16, 2014.
Online issue publication
December 16, 2014
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Double effect: a useful rule that alone cannot justify hastening death
- Assisted suicide and the killing of people? Maybe. Physician-assisted suicide and the killing of patients? No: the rejection of Shaw's new perspective on euthanasia
- Euthanasia, efficiency, and the historical distinction between killing a patient and allowing a patient to die
- The case for physician assisted suicide: how can it possibly be proven?
- The debate about physician assistance in dying: 40 years of unrivalled progress in medical ethics?
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- What is it to do good medical ethics? A kaleidoscope of views
- Medical expertise, existential suffering and ending life
- On the relevance of an argument as regards the role of existential suffering in the end-of-life context
- Of dilemmas and tensions: a qualitative study of palliative care physicians’ positions regarding voluntary active euthanasia in Quebec, Canada