Improving biomedical journals’ ethical policies: the case of research misconduct
Share this article
Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.
Email this article to a friend
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings
- Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008
- Coping with scientific misconduct
- Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central
- Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018
- Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey
- Why unethical papers should be retracted
- Dartmouth College professor resigns after plagiarism finding
- Should research fraud be a crime?
- Plagiarism in research: a survey of African medical journals