Article info
PDFBrief report
Improving biomedical journals’ ethical policies: the case of research misconduct
- Correspondence to Dr Xavier Bosch, Department of Internal Medicine, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, O8036-Barcelona, Spain; xavbosch{at}clinic.ub.es
Citation
Improving biomedical journals’ ethical policies: the case of research misconduct
Publication history
- Received September 7, 2013
- Revised December 22, 2013
- Accepted January 13, 2014
- First published February 6, 2014.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings
- Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008
- Coping with scientific misconduct
- Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central
- Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018
- Research misconduct as a challenge for academic institutions and scientific journals
- Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey
- Why unethical papers should be retracted
- Dartmouth College professor resigns after plagiarism finding
- Should research fraud be a crime?