Article info
PDFAuthor meets critics
A full-blooded defence of full-blooded Epicureanism: responses to my critics
- Correspondence to James Stacey Taylor, Department of Philosophy, Religion, and Classical Studies, The College of New Jersey, 2000 Pennington Road, Ewing, NJ 08628, USA; jtaylor{at}tcnj.edu
Citation
A full-blooded defence of full-blooded Epicureanism: responses to my critics
Publication history
- Received June 26, 2014
- Accepted July 3, 2014
- First published July 25, 2014.
Online issue publication
August 13, 2014
Article Versions
- Previous version (25 July 2014).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Abortion and deprivation: a reply to Marquis
- Meeting the Epicurean challenge: a reply to Christensen
- Taylor on posthumous organ procurement
- Meeting the Epicurean challenge: a reply to ’Abortion and Deprivation'
- Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing
- A stronger policy of organ retrieval from cadaveric donors: some ethical considerations
- Against the strengthened impairment argument: never-born fetuses have no FLO to deprive
- Taylor on presumed consent
- Abortion and the Epicurean challenge
- Mortal harm and the antemortem experience of death