Article Text
PDFAuthor meets critics
A full-blooded defence of full-blooded Epicureanism: responses to my critics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Competing interests None.
-
Patient consent Obtained.
-
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Author meets critics
- Author meets critics
- Author meets critics
- Author meets critics
- Author meets critics
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Abortion and deprivation: a reply to Marquis
- Meeting the Epicurean challenge: a reply to Christensen
- Taylor on posthumous organ procurement
- Meeting the Epicurean challenge: a reply to ’Abortion and Deprivation'
- Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing
- A stronger policy of organ retrieval from cadaveric donors: some ethical considerations
- Against the strengthened impairment argument: never-born fetuses have no FLO to deprive
- Taylor on presumed consent
- Abortion and the Epicurean challenge
- Mortal harm and the antemortem experience of death