Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
I cannot fully respond here to all of the subtle and sophisticated criticisms of my full-blooded Epicureanism that have been advanced by Frederik Kaufman, Stephan Blatti, TM Wilkinson and Walter Glannon.1–4 Accordingly, I will focus on correcting some misunderstandings of my position and on responding to some of the most pressing objections.
Kaufman holds that the implications of my full-blooded Epicureanism are ‘startling,’ since if I am right “killing or being killed in war will be morally inconsequential, saving people from death will be without merit, and execution could not count as punishment”.1 Second, he criticises my distinction between something being a harm to a person (an actual harm that adversely affects her experiences), and something being a harm for a person (when a person's interests are thwarted and this could be regretted on her behalf, but she is not actually harmed). Kaufman holds that this distinction does little work, and that it is question-begging to assert that only harms to a person are harms proper. Finally, Kaufman criticises my view that there might be instances of harmless wrongdoing, claiming that it is ‘a conceptual truth’ that ‘to be wronged entails being harmed’. …
Footnotes
-
Competing interests None.
-
Patient consent Obtained.
-
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Author meets critics
- Author meets critics
- Author meets critics
- Author meets critics
- Author meets critics
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Abortion and deprivation: a reply to Marquis
- Meeting the Epicurean challenge: a reply to Christensen
- Taylor on posthumous organ procurement
- Meeting the Epicurean challenge: a reply to ’Abortion and Deprivation'
- Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing
- A stronger policy of organ retrieval from cadaveric donors: some ethical considerations
- Against the strengthened impairment argument: never-born fetuses have no FLO to deprive
- Taylor on presumed consent
- Abortion and the Epicurean challenge
- Mortal harm and the antemortem experience of death