Article info
PDFAuthor meets critics
Death, posthumous harm, and bioethics
- Correspondence to Dr James Stacey Taylor, Department of Philosophy, The College of New Jersey, 2000 Pennington, Ewing, NJ 08626, USA; jtaylor{at}tcnj.edu
Citation
Death, posthumous harm, and bioethics
Publication history
- Received July 18, 2013
- Accepted August 2, 2013
- First published December 13, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Mortal harm and the antemortem experience of death
- An intellectual history of suffering in the Encyclopedia of Bioethics, 1978–2014
- A full-blooded defence of full-blooded Epicureanism: responses to my critics
- Meeting the Epicurean challenge: a reply to ’Abortion and Deprivation'
- Taylor on presumed consent
- QALYs, euthanasia and the puzzle of death
- Moral motivation regarding dementia risk testing among affected persons in Germany and Israel
- Neurological disorders, affective bioethics, and the nervous system: reconsidering the Schiavo case from a materialist perspective
- Abortion and deprivation: a reply to Marquis
- Comments on Death, Posthumous Harm and Bioethics