Article Text
Current controversy
Wait times and national health policy
Abstract
Many arguments against US healthcare reform appeal to facts about wait times, and wait times are also discussed in debates about national health policy in other industrialised countries. This paper points out that there are several different ways to measure wait times. We currently measure them in one way, and this paper describes an alternative. The most reasonable assessments of US and international health reforms need to rely on the alternative method, and so when critics of health reform rely on the standard method, their arguments are unsound.
- Distributive Justice
- Resource Allocation
- Health Care Economics
- Political Philosophy
- Quality of Health Care
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Waiting times and prioritisation for coronary artery bypass surgery in New Zealand
- Demographic trends of patients undergoing ophthalmic surgery in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study
- Determinants of patient satisfaction with cataract surgery and length of time on the waiting list
- Dietitian first gastroenterology clinic: an initiative to reduce wait lists and wait times for gastroenterology outpatients in a tertiary hospital service
- Improving the quality of care with a single-entry model of referral for total joint replacement: a preimplementation/postimplementation evaluation
- Potential for bias in waiting time studies: events between enrolment and admission
- US gets mediocre results despite high spending on health care
- Review of referrals reveal the impact of referral content on the triage and management of ophthalmology wait lists
- Temporal trends in ophthalmic surgical demand in a universal healthcare system: an Ontario population-based study of over two decades
- Waiting-list interventions for children and young people using child and adolescent mental health services: a systematic review