Article Text
PDFCommentary
There are (STILL) no coercive offers
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Contributors Both authors are responsible for the drafting and editing of this manuscript.
-
Competing interests None.
-
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
-
↵i Also see Wertheimer A. Coercion. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987.
Linked Articles
- Feature article
- Commentary
- Commentary
- Commentary
- Commentary
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The kindest cut? Surgical castration, sex offenders and coercive offers
- Surgical castration, Texas law and the case of Mr T
- Surgical castration, coercion and ethics
- Offering castration to sex offenders: the significance of the state's intentions
- Making the cut: analytical and empirical bioethics
- Chemical castration for sex offenders
- Should neurotechnological treatments offered to offenders always be in their best interests?
- Neurointerventions and informed consent
- Surgical castration, coercive offers and coercive effects: it is still not about consent
- Payment for research participation: a coercive offer?