Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Persons who commit crimes involving sexual abuse of children exploit their victims in several ways. Sex offenders use their power and authority over vulnerable children to whom they have easy access. Teachers, coaches, clergy, family members and childcare workers have been exposed as sex offenders. The Pennsylvania State University football coach, Jerry Sandusky, is now in prison for his many crimes. The widespread cover up of sexual abuse by Catholic priests in the USA and other countries is a horrendous scandal. It is not surprising that law enforcement, mental health professionals, victims and their families are outraged. It is no surprise that radical interventions such as chemical or surgical castration are a response to the public pressure to protect children from molestation.
I agree with Professor John McMillan's thoughtful discussion and nuanced analysis of surgical castration.1i He concludes that surgical castration of sex offenders is ethically permissible if these conditions are met:
Castration should be requested by the sex offender.
Informed consent (including positive and negative side effects) from a competent sex offender is required.
Consent to castration must not be coerced via threats or inducements.
He also says that “castration might be useful for the reconfiguring of a life that has gone badly awry.”
To supplement his discussion I will describe a state law in Texas2 that permits voluntary surgical castration (orchidectomy) for repeat child molesters while they are incarcerated as …
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
↵i Surgical castration may refer either to testicular or pulpectomy if parts of the core of the testes are removed or orchidectomy in which the testes are fully removed.
↵ii The following information about Mr T is based on my personal observations and experience acquired through monitoring him since 1998. Mr T has consented to the publication of this information and has read and approved the text insofar as it relates to him.
- Feature article
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The kindest cut? Surgical castration, sex offenders and coercive offers
- Preventing sexual abusers of children from reoffending: systematic review of medical and psychological interventions
- Experimental interventions with sex offenders: a brief review of their efficacy
- Surgical castration, coercion and ethics
- Psychological interventions for treatment of adult sex offenders
- Offering castration to sex offenders: the significance of the state's intentions
- Should neurotechnological treatments offered to offenders always be in their best interests?
- Drug treatment is proposed to manage child sex offenders
- Chemical castration for sex offenders
- There are (STILL) no coercive offers