Article info
PDFFeature article
The kindest cut? Surgical castration, sex offenders and coercive offers
- Correspondence to Professor John McMillan, Bioethics Centre, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, PO Box 913, Dunedin, Otago 9054, New Zealand; john.mcmillan{at}otago.ac.nz
Citation
The kindest cut? Surgical castration, sex offenders and coercive offers
Publication history
- Received August 16, 2012
- Revised March 10, 2013
- Accepted April 10, 2013
- First published May 11, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Chemical castration for sex offenders
- Surgical castration, coercion and ethics
- Indian medical experts shun chemical castration for rapists
- Surgical castration, Texas law and the case of Mr T
- Making the cut: analytical and empirical bioethics
- Offering castration to sex offenders: the significance of the state's intentions
- Benign metastasising leiomyoma: a progressive disease despite chemical and surgical castration
- Neurointerventions and informed consent
- Drug treatment is proposed to manage child sex offenders
- France plans compulsory treatment of sex offenders