Responses
Current controversy
Forced circumcision of men (abridged)
Compose a Response to This Article
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 16 July 2014
- Published on: 16 July 2014Forced circumcision of children also unethicalShow More
This is a very telling paper, for if it is true that forced circumcision of an adult male is a violation of his human rights, it must follow that forced circumcision of a male minor - a boy or an infant - is a violation of his human rights and equally wrong. The age at which it is done does not matter - as you can see from a simple thought experiment.
It is held by many people in Australia and the United States...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
Other content recommended for you
- Conflict-related sexual violence: a review
- War-related sexual and gender-based violence in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia: a community-based study
- Violence: a glossary
- Is Australia engaged in torturing asylum seekers? A cautionary tale for Europe
- Household food insecurity and its association with self-reported male perpetration of intimate partner violence: a survey of two districts in central and western Uganda
- Preventing violence against refugee adolescent girls: findings from a cluster randomised controlled trial in Ethiopia
- Health impact of human rights testimony: harming the most vulnerable?
- The law and ethics of male circumcision: guidance for doctors
- Potential impact of the Human Rights Act on psychiatric practice: the best of British values?
- Religious circumcision and the Human Rights Act