Article info
PDFCurrent controversy
Forced circumcision of men (abridged)
- Correspondence to Michael Glass, 35 Goodlet Street, Ashbury, NSW 2193, Australia; m.glass{at}optusnet.com.au
Citation
Forced circumcision of men (abridged)
Publication history
- Received June 10, 2013
- Accepted July 11, 2013
- First published September 6, 2013.
Online issue publication
July 16, 2014
Article Versions
- Previous version (6 September 2013).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Conflict-related sexual violence: a review
- War-related sexual and gender-based violence in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia: a community-based study
- Violence: a glossary
- Is Australia engaged in torturing asylum seekers? A cautionary tale for Europe
- Household food insecurity and its association with self-reported male perpetration of intimate partner violence: a survey of two districts in central and western Uganda
- Preventing violence against refugee adolescent girls: findings from a cluster randomised controlled trial in Ethiopia
- Health impact of human rights testimony: harming the most vulnerable?
- The law and ethics of male circumcision: guidance for doctors
- Potential impact of the Human Rights Act on psychiatric practice: the best of British values?
- Religious circumcision and the Human Rights Act