Article Text
Research ethics
Paper
Personal knowledge and study participation
Abstract
Scientists in earlier times considered personal research participation an essential component of their work. Exposing themselves to untested interventions was seen as the most ethical way to gauge the human response to those interventions. The practice was also educational, for it generated useful information that helped researchers plan subsequent human studies. Self-experimentation was eventually replaced by more comprehensive ethical codes governing human research. But it is time to bring back the practice of self-experimentation, albeit in modified form. Through serving as a study subject, investigators and other research professionals can obtain valuable information about their work.
- Clinical trials
- Education for Health Care Professionals
- Research Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The influence of risk and monetary payment on the research participation decision making process
- Limits to research risks
- An investigation of patients’ motivations for their participation in genetics-related research
- What makes clinical labour different? The case of human guinea pigging
- Community based trials and informed consent in rural north India
- ‘You want to deal with power while riding on power’: global perspectives on power in participatory health research and co-production approaches
- The case for a new system for oversight of research on human subjects
- ‘I feel that I should decide on my own….’: who should be involved in the decision-making process for adolescent involvement in HIV research?
- Genetic research and the collective good: participants as leaders to reconcile individual and public interests
- Human infection challenge studies in endemic settings and/or low-income and middle-income countries: key points of ethical consensus and controversy