Public health ethics
Veracity and rhetoric in paediatric medicine: a critique of Svoboda and Van Howe's response to the AAP policy on infant male circumcision
Share this article
Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.
Email this article to a friend
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Out of step: fatal flaws in the latest AAP policy report on neonatal circumcision
- Circumcision of male infants as a human rights violation
- Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights
- Prophylactic interventions on children: balancing human rights with public health
- A covenant with the status quo? Male circumcision and the new BMA guidance to doctors
- Medical aspects of male circumcision
- Benefits of newborn circumcision: is Europe ignoring medical evidence?
- Circumcision: Divided we fall
- Male circumcision and HIV prevention: ethical, medical and public health tradeoffs in low-income countries
- The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision