Objective To compare assessments of the decision-making competencies of psychiatric inpatients as provided by physicians, nurses, relatives and an assessment tool.
Methods This study was carried out at the psychiatry clinic of Kocaeli University Hospital from June 2007 to February 2008. The decision-making competence of the 83 patients who participated in the study was assessed by physicians, nurses, relatives and MacCAT-T.
Results Of the 83 patients, the relatives of 73.8% of them, including the parents of 47.7%, were interviewed during the study. A moderately good consistency between the competency assessments of the nurses versus those of the physicians, but a poor consistency between the assessments of the physicians and nurses versus those of the patients’ relatives, was determined. The differences in the competency assessment obtained with the MacCAT-T versus the evaluations of the physicians, nurses and patients’ relatives were statistically significant.
Conclusions Our findings demonstrate those physicians, nurses and the patients’ relatives have difficulty in identifying patients lacking decision-making competence. Therefore, an objective competence assessment tool should be used along with the assessments of physicians and nurses, both of whom can provide clinical data, as well as those of relatives, who can offer insights into the patient's moral values and expectations.
- Clinical Ethics
- Informed Consent
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Life-prolonging treatment in nursing homes: how do physicians and nurses describe and justify their own practice?
- Drawing the line on physician-assisted death
- Advanced Practice Nursing Competency Assessment Instrument (APNCAI): clinimetric validation
- Assessing the patient safety competencies of healthcare professionals: a systematic review
- Assessment of competences in rheumatology training: results of a systematic literature review to inform EULAR points to consider
- Is this person with dementia (currently) competent to request euthanasia? A complicated and underexplored question
- Model for directly assessing and improving clinical competence and performance in revalidation of clinicians
- JAG consensus statements for training and certification in flexible sigmoidoscopy
- Anesthesia residency training in regional anesthesiology and acute pain medicine: a competency-based model curriculum
- JAG consensus statements for training and certification in colonoscopy