Article Text
Abstract
This paper reviews the ethical literature on conflicts between health professionals and parents about medical decision-making for children. We present the results of a systematic review which addressed the question ‘when health professionals and parents disagree about the appropriate course of medical treatment for a child, under what circumstances is the health professional ethically justified in overriding the parents’ wishes?’ We identified nine different ethical frameworks that were put forward by their authors as applicable across various ages and clinical scenarios. Each of these frameworks centred on a different key moral concept including harm, constrained parental autonomy, best interests, medically reasonable alternatives, responsible thinking and rationality.
- Children
- Decision-making
- Family
- Minors/Parental Consent
- Paediatrics
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Other content recommended for you
- Harm is all you need? Best interests and disputes about parental decision - making
- Settling for second best: when should doctors agree to parental demands for suboptimal medical treatment
- Indeterminacy and the normative basis of the harm threshold for overriding parental decisions: a response to Birchley
- The best interest standard and children: clarifying a concept and responding to its critics
- Harm is n't all you need: parental discretion and medical decisions for a child
- Medically assisted gender affirmation: when children and parents disagree
- Children of Jehovah ’s Witnesses and adolescent Jehovah ’s Witnesses: what are their rights
- Methods and principles in biomedical ethics
- Is ‘ best interests ’ the right standard in cases like that of Charlie Gard
- A threshold of significant harm (f) or a viable alternative therapeutic option