Article info
PDFCurrent controversy
The pearl of the ‘Pro-Life’ movement? Reflections on the Kermit Gosnell controversy
- Correspondence to Ms Kate Greasley, Law Faculty, New College, Oxford University, Oxford OX1 3BN, UK; kate.greasley{at}new.ox.ac.uk
Citation
The pearl of the ‘Pro-Life’ movement? Reflections on the Kermit Gosnell controversy
Publication history
- Received April 25, 2013
- Revised June 5, 2013
- Accepted June 13, 2013
- First published July 11, 2013.
Online issue publication
May 19, 2014
Article Versions
- Previous version (11 July 2013).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Birth, meaningful viability and abortion
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- Why appeals to the moral significance of birth are saddled with a dilemma
- Thomson, the right to life, and partial birth abortion or two MULES * for Sister Sarah
- Missouri passes antiabortion law
- The moral status of babies
- Whither abortion policy in Britain
- Concern for our vulnerable prenatal and neonatal children: a brief reply to Giubilini and Minerva
- Is it ethical for a general practitioner to claim a conscientious objection when asked to refer for abortion