Article info
PDFCurrent controversy
The pearl of the ‘Pro-Life’ movement? Reflections on the Kermit Gosnell controversy
- Correspondence to Ms Kate Greasley, Law Faculty, New College, Oxford University, Oxford OX1 3BN, UK; kate.greasley{at}new.ox.ac.uk
Citation
The pearl of the ‘Pro-Life’ movement? Reflections on the Kermit Gosnell controversy
Publication history
- Received April 25, 2013
- Revised June 5, 2013
- Accepted June 13, 2013
- First published July 11, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- The rise of medical abortions in the US
- Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- Birth, meaningful viability and abortion
- Issues for service providers: a response to points raised
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- The Israeli abortion committees' process of decision making: an ethical analysis
- Estimating the incidence of abortion: using the Abortion Incidence Complications Methodology in Ghana, 2017
- The place for individual conscience
- DeGrazia on abortion law and policy
- Barriers and facilitators of access to first-trimester abortion services for women in the developed world: a systematic review